Assessment for Learning Practices and Their Effect on Motivation in Science Labs

Ayu Ardini; Wahyu Erwanda; Fatoni Aziz; Nur Farhana Binti Salleh

doi:10.71094/esensi.v2i2.311

Authors

Ayu Ardini Biology Study Program, Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author
Wahyu Erwanda Biology Study Program, Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author
Fatoni Aziz Biology Study Program, Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author
Nur Farhana Binti Salleh Biology Study Program, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71094/esensi.v2i2.311

Keywords:

Assessment For Learning, Science Laboratory Instruction, Student Motivation, Formative Assessment, Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

This study examines the effect of Assessment for Learning (AfL) practices on student motivation in science laboratory settings. Motivation remains a persistent issue, especially when assessment focuses on grades and final outputs rather than learning processes. This research addresses that gap by analyzing how formative assessment strategies influence intrinsic motivation, perceived autonomy, perceived competence, and student engagement during laboratory activities. A quasi-experimental design was used, involving an experimental group that applied AfL practices and a comparison group that used conventional assessment methods. Data were collected through motivation questionnaires, classroom observations, and student reflections administered before and after the intervention. Quantitative analysis measured changes in motivational dimensions, while qualitative data supported interpretation of engagement and learning behaviors. The findings show that AfL practices significantly enhance student motivation in laboratory contexts. Students receiving formative feedback, self-assessment, peer assessment, and structured milestone tasks reported higher intrinsic motivation and stronger perceptions of autonomy and competence. They also demonstrated increased engagement, persistence, and reflective learning behaviors. In contrast, the comparison group showed minimal change. These results confirm that assessment design directly shapes laboratory learning experiences and can foster deeper, sustained student motivation.

References

Akıllı, M., Keskin, H. K., & Ay, Ş. (2017). Farklılaştırılmış fen deneylerini değerlendirme sürecinin öğrencilerin fene karşı tutum ve motivasyonları üzerindeki etkisi. E-Kafkas Journal Of Educational Research, 4(1), 51-56.

Akmal, D. A., & Efendi, N. (2024). Newton’s Law Practicum Enhancing Science Motivation and Learning: Praktikum Hukum Newton Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Pembelajaran Sains. Inquest Journal, 3(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.53622/ij.v3i1.348

Anderson, J. (2016). Student engagement and the learning incentive program: Evidence and applications. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind Brain and Culture, 12(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.7790/SA.V12I1.429

Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11218-010-9144-9

Asyhari, A., Irawan, W. D., Sunyono, S., Rosidin, U., Sowiyah, S., & Hariri, H. (2024). FLM-based AFL improves physics engagement and conceptual understanding. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20925

Beers, M. J. (2020). Playing like you practice: Formative and summative techniques to assess student learning. High impact teaching for sport and exercise psychology educators, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429316210-10

Bree, R. T., Dunne, K., Brereton, B., et al. (2014). Engaging learning and addressing over-assessment in the science laboratory: Solving a pervasive problem. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 6(2), 1–15.

Costa, L. M., & Reis, M. J. (2025). Motivational teaching techniques in secondary and higher education: A systematic review of active learning methodologies. Digital, 5(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5030040

Coutinho, I. R. . (2023). The Impact of Active Methodologies and External Examination on Students’ Motivation. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(12), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.15893

Diwakar, S., Kolil, V. K., Francis, S. P., & Achuthan, K. (2023). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among students for laboratory courses-Assessing the impact of virtual laboratories. Computers & Education, 198, 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104758

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in higher education, 53(2), 229-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

Haw, L. H., Sharif, S. B., & Han, C. G. K. (2022). Predictors of student engagement in science learning: The role of science laboratory learning environment and science learning motivation. Asia pacific journal Of educators and education, 37(2), 1-21.

Hubbard, L., Jackman-Ryan, S., & Thomson, M. M. (2022). Immersive research experiences: Influences on science teaching motivation and practices. IAFOR Journal of Psychology & the Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijpbs.8.1.05

Ismail, N. H., & Osman, K. (2024). Exploring formative assessment strategies in the chemistry classroom in secondary school: a systematic literature review (SLR). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 464-484. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i2/21226

Kaya, O. N., & Kaya, Z. (2024). The impact of co-design-based formative assessment practices on preservice science teachers’ understanding of chemical concepts in a general chemistry laboratory course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(4), 996-1017. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00225j

Liu, P. P., McKinney, D., Lee, A. A., Schmidt, J. A., Marchand, G. C., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2023). A mixed-methods exploration of mastery goal support in 7th-grade science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 41(2), 201-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2140807

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Burns, E. C., Kennett, R., & Pearson, J. (2021). Load reduction instruction in science and students’ science engagement and science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000552

Mngomezulu, H., Ramaila, S., Ramnarain, U., & Dhurumraj, T. (2024). Enhancing learners’ self-regulated learning in physical sciences classrooms through formative assessment intervention strategies. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 20(10), em2524. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15472

Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2011). Learning-enabled computer assessment of science labs with scaffolds methodology. The Technology Interface International Journal, 11(2), 60-65.

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-017-9688-1

Özbulut, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2025). Fostering academic intrinsic motivation through PDEODE-based chemistry laboratory activities. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 8(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.70325/eyyad.1652272

Purwoko, A. A., Anwar, Y. A. S., Hadisaputra, S., & Burhanuddin, B. (2024). Motivation, Laboratory Activities, and Self Regulated Learning: How Are They Related. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 481, p. 04005). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448104005

Rane, A. (2023). Using meaningful gamification to redesign simulation-labs for engaging learners in science inquiry practices. In International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.58459/icce.2023.1497

Scierri, I. D. M. (2021). Formative Assessment Strategies And Toolsto Promote Self-Regulated Learning: A Reasoned Review Of Empirical Studies. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 24, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-024-scie

Shumow, L., Schmidt, J. A., & Zaleski, D. J. (2013). Multiple perspectives on student learning, engagement, and motivation in high school biology labs. The High School Journal, 96(3), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1353/HSJ.2013.0010

Stanton, K., & Lindsay, E. (2011, October). A preliminary motivational evaluation of milestone-based laboratory assessment. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. T3G-1). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6143058

Thomas, A. E., & Müller, F. H. (2014). Autonomy support: a key for understanding students learning motivation in science?. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 4(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/S35834-013-0073-5

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Zhao, F., Roehrig, G., Patrick, L., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Cotner, S. H. (2021). Using a self-determination theory approach to understand student perceptions of inquiry-based learning. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 9(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.5.