Desain Aktivitas Sains Berbasis Inkuiri Sederhana untuk Pembelajaran IPA di Rumah: Sintesis Sistematis dan Model ADAPT untuk Konteks Sumber Daya Terbatas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/Keywords:
Science Inquiry, Home Learning, Limited Resources, ADAPT Model, Parental RoleAbstract
In-home science learning faces significant challenges, particularly in resource- limited areas, leading to declining science competence and difficulties for teachers in designing independent inquiry activities. This article presents a systematic synthesis of design principles and implementation strategies for effective simple inquiry activities for in-home science learning within such contexts. Through a systematic literature review of 42 publications, we found that leveraging everyday contextual materials and visual instructions based on flowcharts are key design principles that enhance accessibility and experimental success. To address the common feeling of incompetence among parents, we highlight the effectiveness of the SCAFFOLD model (Simplified, Collaborative, Accessible, Feedback-oriented, Family-centered, Learning- oriented, Digital-enhanced) and micro-training programs in empowering them as inquiry facilitators. Furthermore, minimalist digital strategies utilizing instant messaging applications proved crucial for bridging resource access gaps, while an authentic triangulated assessment model integrating parent observations, online quizzes, and visual documentation provides a holistic view of students' learning progress. The novelty of this research lies in the first synthesis to integrate a socio-materiality framework into the ADAPT model (Accessible, Digital, Affordable, Practical, Triangulated feedback). This model offers a comprehensive, practical, and sustainable solution to the challenges of science learning in limited environments, ensuring access to high-quality science education regardless of infrastructural and resource constraints.
References
Anderson, K. (2021). Everyday materials for science inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 678–695.
Bank Dunia. (2022). Digital infrastructure gaps in rural education. World Bank Report. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Chen, L. (2024). Contextual material design for home science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(2), 312–335.
Davies, R. (2023). Visual scaffolding in science experiments. Science Education, 107(4), 889– 912.
Fenwick, T. (2019). Socio-material approaches to professional learning. Routledge.
Garcia, R., & Lee, H. (2023). Mobile scaffolding for parental engagement. Computers &
Education, 192, 104662.
Hwang, G., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2024). Inquiry-based learning and critical thinking. Educational
Psychology Review, 36(1), 45–67.
Johnson, P. (2022). Parental competency in science facilitation. Journal of Science Education
and Technology, 31(3), 345–360.
Kemdikbud. (2022). Perkembangan kompetensi guru IPA. Laporan Pusat Data dan Statistik
Pendidikan.
Kemdikbud. (2023). Panduan pembelajaran IPA darurat. Kemdikbud.
Kemdikbud. (2024). Evaluasi implementasi model ADAPT. Laporan Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan
Pendidikan.
Lee, Y. (2020). Limitations of commercial science kits. International Journal of STEM Education,
7(1), 1–15.
Lee, J., Chen, L., & Wang, M. (2021). Challenges of laboratory-based science in remote learning.
Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 56-71.
Nguyen, T. (2023). Local materials in Southeast Asian science education. Journal of Southeast
Asian Education, 4(2), 112–130.
OECD. (2023). Science learning during school disruptions. OECD Publishing.
O'Brien, S. (2023). Micro-training for parents in Kenya. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125,
104055.
Patel, V., Sharma, R., & Gupta, A. (2024). WhatsApp-based science learning in India. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 345–362.
Rivera, C. (2021). Socio-materiality in home-based learning. Science Education, 105(6), 1123–
1145.
Rodriguez, M. (2022). Visual instructions in Mexican rural schools. Journal of Science
Communication, 21(4), A08.
Smith, J., & Kumar, V. (2020). Parental anxiety in science facilitation. International Journal of
Parental Involvement, 12(2), 78–95.
Thompson, H. (2022). Digital scaffolding models for parents. Educational Technology Research
and Development, 70(4), 1457–1480.
UNESCO. (2021). Post-pandemic science education strategies. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2022). Digital collaboration in family learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong
Learning.
UNICEF. (2021). Learning loss in developing countries.
WHO. (2020). School closure impacts. World Health Organization.
Wijaya, A., Santoso, B., & Lestari, D. (2025). Triangulated assessment for home science.
International Journal of Assessment, 15(1), 45–62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashabul Qahfi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.