Systematic Analysis of Learning Models to Improve Students' Mathematical Representation Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/logika.v1i2.216Keywords:
Learning Model Mathematical , Representation Problem-Based Learning, Realistic Mathematics Education, Think Talk–WriteAbstract
This study aims to systematically analyze the learning model used in improving students' mathematical representation skills. The research approach used is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with reference to the PRISMA flow, which involves the process of identification, selection, and synthesis of Scopus indexed articles published in the range of 2020–2025. From the results of the screening of data sources from Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, Wiley, and MDPI, five core articles were obtained that met the criteria of relevance and quality. The analysis was carried out through thematic coding techniques to identify the focus of learning interventions, representational strategies, and the achievement of students' mathematical representation skills. The results of the analysis showed that learning models such as Problem-Based Learning, Realistic Mathematics Education, Brain-Based Learning-based TANDUR, Think Talk–Write, and GeoGebra-assisted Discovery Learning consistently improved students' verbal, symbolic, and visual representations. Improvement occurs when learning provides meaningful context, structured representational scaffolding, and visual-interactive manipulation as a medium for concept exploration. In conclusion, the effectiveness of improving mathematical representation skills is not only determined by the chosen learning model, but also by the quality of pedagogical design and the consistency of teachers in systematically integrating representational strategies in the learning process.
References
Ahmad, N., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Metacognitive strategy to support mathematical representation. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 4(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.23960/jmp.v4i3.120
Amri, A., Saragih, S., & Hasibuan, M. (2021). The effectiveness of problembased learning to improve students' mathematical representation ability. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14148a
Dilla, S., Anggraeni, R., & Noto, M. S. (2020). Students' mathematical representation ability through contextual learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11084
Erdogan, F. (2021). Computer-supported representations in algebra learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5305–5324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10568-2
Fauzan, A., Sletten, M., & Plomp, T. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education for developing representation ability. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1545–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09981-6
Gacitua, L., & Beatriz, S. (2021). Representational fluency in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10053-y
Hegarty, M., & Yoon, S. (2021). Visual representation in STEM reasoning. Cognitive Science, 45(7), e12992. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12992
Hidayati, D., & Faradillah, A. (2022). Inquiry-based learning to enhance mathematical representation skills. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i1.17891
Khoirunnisa, K., & Sugandi, A. (2022). Multiple representations in project-based learning: An experimental study. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.792
Kwon, O. (2022). Cognitive load and representation switching in problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101544
Putri, R. I. I., & Herman, T. (2021). Enhancing representation skills through contextual-based tasks. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(8), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.9
Rahman, A., & Yuniarti, D. (2020). Visualization strategies in algebraic representation. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.14.2.12450
Roh, K. H., & Lee, Y. (2023). Supporting students' representation through scaffolding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 71, 101008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101008
Siregar, H., & Tambunan, S. (2023). STEM-based tasks for enhancing representation skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2251. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13150
Susanti, E., & Widodo, S. (2021). Validity of learning modules to improve representation ability. Beta: Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 14(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v14i1.373
Syafri, F., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2021). Designing PBL tasks to support students' mathematical representation. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.12312
Thahir, A., & Abdullah, A. (2023). Effect of blended learning on students' mathematical representations. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.1193
Trinugroho, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2020). PBL with GeoGebra to strengthen mathematical representation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663, 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012050
Widyastuti, U., & Purwanto, D. (2020). Mathematical representation during problem-solving. JRAMathEdu, 5(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.21580/jramathedu.2020.5.2.6212
Xu, Y., & Clarke, D. (2020). Mathematical representation as communication. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1223–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salwa Rania, Reno Purnomo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







