Students' Cognitive Abilities and Self-Regulated Learning in Digital Mathematics Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/logika.v2i1.332Keywords:
student cognitive , self-regulated learning , digital mathematicsAbstract
Advances in educational technology have encouraged the integration of digital learning into mathematics learning, so the main challenge faced is how students can optimize their cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning (SRL) in digital environments. Students' cognitive abilities—which include thinking processes, conceptual understanding, and mathematical reasoning—are key to the success of digital mathematics learning. Meanwhile, SRL, as students' ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning process, plays a crucial role in regulating the effective use of digital resources, including time management, learning strategies, and emotional regulation. This article describes the relationship between students' cognitive abilities and SRL in the context of digital mathematics learning and the factors that influence both aspects. The study results indicate that the use of digital learning technology combined with strategies to enhance SRL can improve students' conceptual understanding and mathematical problem-solving skills. The interaction between cognitive abilities and SRL also strengthens the role of metacognition in helping students learn independently and effectively in digital environments. This study proposes a learning model that combines digital features with scaffolding techniques designed to strengthen students' cognition and self-regulation to improve mathematics learning outcomes.
References
Hevitria, H., Arrosyad, M. I., Tohir, M., & Adilliyah, A. (2024). Self-regulation as a determinant of cognitive ability in technology-based mathematics learning media. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), 134–148.
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2025). Increasing students’ self-regulated learning through realistic mathematical education. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 9(1), 1–15.
Kusmaharti, D., & Yustitia, V. (2025). Self-regulated learning-based digital module development to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 87–99.
Sholeha, W. J., & Nufus, H. (2025). Analisis berpikir kreatif matematis siswa ditinjau dari self-regulated learning. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 45–58.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2019). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 1–12.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
Pintrich, P. R. (2016). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–23.
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Byrne, C., & Lyons, G. (2020). The use of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103641.
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Learning Analytics, 61–75.
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of digital learning in mathematics education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 1–15.
Lai, C., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated learning approach to improving students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.
Kramarski, B., & Friedman, S. (2014). Metacognitive instruction in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 1–23.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2017). Self-regulated learning as a constructive process. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 1–16.
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. Metacognition and Learning, 13(3), 213–240.
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 1–16.
Kim, D., & Lim, C. (2019). Designing online learning environments for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1–21.
Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53.
Li, Q., & Ma, L. (2022). Cognitive processes and digital mathematics learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 1–18.
Van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281.
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Handbook of self-regulated learning and performance. New York: Routledge.
Voogt, J., et al. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education. Educational Research Review, 14, 1–18.
Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–25.
Rahman, A., & Suryadi, D. (2023). Self-regulated learning and mathematical cognitive development in digital classrooms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 389–404.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agus Adnan, Izoya Putri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







