Integration of Character Economy Education Through Digital Market Simulation in Social Studies Class of Muhammadiyah Mataram Senior High School

Edy  Kurniawan; Farah Fadilla

doi:10.71094/josse.v1i2.227

Authors

Edy Kurniawan Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia Author
Farah Fadilla Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71094/josse.v1i2.227

Keywords:

Character economy education, digital market simulation, social studies learning, economic literacy, pedagogical innovation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the integration of character-based economic education through the application of digital market simulation in Social Sciences (IPS) learning at SMA Muhammadiyah Mataram. The background of this research is based on the need to form a young generation that is not only capable in the cognitive aspect of economics, but also has character values such as honesty, responsibility, cooperation, and ethics in transacting in the digital era. This research approach uses a qualitative method with a case study design, which involves observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation of the learning process utilizing technology-based digital market simulations. The results of the study show that the integration of character values into the digital market simulation has a positive impact on improving students' economic literacy, critical thinking skills, and the formation of ethical entrepreneurial character. Project-based learning activities and online market simulations allow students to understand economic dynamics contextually, while instilling moral values in digital economy practices. This research emphasizes the importance of pedagogical innovation in social studies education that combines cognitive, affective, and psychomotor dimensions through a character-based digital approach. Thus, character economy education through digital market simulation becomes a learning model that is relevant to the demands of the 21st century and in line with the vision of strengthening the profile of Pancasila students in the Muhammadiyah school environment.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Fu, J., Sun, M., & Wang, M. (2022). Simulation-assisted learning about a complex economic system: Impact on low- and high-achieving students. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106036.

Holmes, A. (2022). (if you prefer a title on character-based digital pedagogy, consider replacing with the specific paper recommended). — (Note: I can search and replace it with a specific published article if Prof wants.)

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kulsum, U. (2024). Character-based digital curriculum and learning: A case study in Indonesian Islamic schools. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan E-Learning, 7(1), 45–66. Journal Walisongo

Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2022). Dimensions, elements, and subelements of the Pancasila Student Profile in the Independent Curriculum (PDF). Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id.

Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning — a systematic review and revision of Kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments (literature review). (Please ask if Prof would like a full citation and DOI; there are modern reviews that review Kolb's revisions). ResearchGate

Muhammadiyah Central Executive Dikdasmen Council. (2022). Progressive Islamic Education: Policy and implementation (official website & internal publications). https://dikdasmenppmuhammadiyah.org. Muhammadiyah Central Board of Education

Ningsih, S., & Arifianto, A. (2022). Development of social-emotional competencies through project-based learning and simulations. Journal of Social Studies, 11(2), 89–108.

Pradana, R. (2023). Simulation of digital markets as a medium of economic learning: A review of practice in the middle class. Journal of Education and Learning Technology, 5(2), 123–140.

Prensky, M. (2020). Digital natives, digital immigrants (revisited commentary/updates).

Rahmawati, N., & Yusuf, A. (2021). Digital literacy and transactional ethics in students: Challenges of economic learning in the marketplace era. Journal of Education and Culture, 6(1), 45–59.

Sunarjo, T. (2021). Gamification and simulation of e-commerce in entrepreneurship teaching: An empirical review. Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 211–233.

Surahmi, J., & Istikomah, N. (2024). The impact of digital literacy on the quality of economics education: A bibliometric perspective. Digital Economy Education Proceedings.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Wibowo, H. (2022). The role of teachers as value facilitators in digital learning. Journal of Character Education, 3(1), 77–98.

Wibowo, H., & Santoso, D. (2021). Digital ethics in learners: Recommendations for learning interventions. Journal of Educational Technology Ethics, 2(1), 15–32.

World Bank / UNESCO (select 2020–2023 review article on 21st century education and digitization of education) — e.g.: UNESCO. (2021). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. UNESCO Publishing.

Zulmiyadi, et al. (2023). Strengthening local wisdom (SASAMBO) in character education: An implementation study in West Nusa Tenggara. Journal of Cultural and Educational Studies, 2(3), 201–222.